Spring, last week, at Glendhu Bay in Wanaka, NZ |
My seasons teaching skiing in New Zealand include an amazing
amount of instructing mileage, most of it with beginner and intermediate
skiers. Thankfully, it’s the best way I know to vet my ideas, shore up my
understanding, and secure my belief in the fundamentals.
Each season, some theme seems to arise from the volume of
work that I do which helps put skiing and teaching into perspective for me. That
was certainly the case this past season, and that theme is still both cracking
me up and informing my teaching. So, without further or due, Russ’s 2017 Big
Picture Theme and Groundbreaking Thought About Skiing, drumroll please … wait
for it …
Physics is only
complicated when you explain it.
I’ve settled on the belief that once kids can run around,
throw balls and catch them, annoy their sisters, and figure out that the stove
is hot to the touch, their understanding of physics is perfect and all we can
do as adults is mess that up. I’ll prove it to you with a few basic examples
I’ve been using with guests – adults and kids. You’ll have to use your
imagination (you were a kid once so you should have some imagination in there
somewhere).
Example 1. First, a non-skiing example to keep it simple.
Imagine a kid who’s learned to ride a bike with training wheels and who is
heading out for their inaugural voyage without them. First, they adjust their
balance going in a straight line. Then, once they're feeling good, they go around
the corner. Now, imagine a kid going around the corner on a bike for the first
time and tipping the bike the wrong way, to the outside of the corner instead
of towards the inside. Huh? Exactly; it’ll never happen. They instinctively
know how and in what direction to tip the bike. Now imagine what would happen
if you tried to explain to them about tipping the bike going around the corner
before they tried it for the first time. This is when you start to sound like
the adults in a Peanuts cartoon (blah, blah, blah) and the only other sound
you’ll hear if you’re paying attention is the sound of the fun getting sucked
out of bike riding.
Example 2. Imagine that all five of us are in the back seat
of my dad’s car on the way to soccer practice. Now, we all know that my father
drives too fast, and today he takes a left turn way too fast. You, sitting on
the far right side of the car seat as you are, get smooshed by the rest of us
against the right side, don’t you?! Now, to stop you from getting smooshed will
it work if we let our weight go to our right foot, stay strong on that leg and
foot as the car goes around the corner? The answer is “duh”, of course it
works. This is a good time to practice your quizzical kid, ‘adults are weird’
look – it’s very valuable.
Example 3. A common thing that ski instructors do when
skiing with kids across very flat ground is the game of world-wide fame called
“pole basket slingshot”. It’s simple: while sliding along your most despised
cat track have a kid behind and slightly offset to one side of you grab hold of
the basket of your ski pole that you’ve extended back towards her while you
keep your hand on the grip, right pole if she’s on the right side, left if on
the left (without poking her with it – safety first). Once she’s got a firm
grasp, pull the pole quickly forward so she rockets forward. As long as kids
understand the goal (e.g. going fast) they’ll know precisely when to let go of
the pole so that they slingshot past you. Mix it up, change speeds, sides,
facial expressions and you’ll all have a blast as long as you make appropriate
sound effects. Explain the physics of the slingshot to them and they’ll
suddenly miss their parents and will dread skiing with you forever.
I love talking to adults about skiing in this way, using
these examples about our natural understanding of physics. I particularly love
it when there’s a kid available to prove the point. Telling parents that their 6-year-old
child has a perfect understanding of physics and then proving it never ceases
to entertain me, although I usually have to redeem myself with one of my
celebrated uncle jokes (“Hey, kid, snot funny. It’s, just, snot, funny.”).
Remember when Bill Clinton addressed the Democratic National
Convention as keynote speaker when Dukakis was nominated? He droned on forever
and then got resounding applause when he said “In conclusion”. We’re at that
point here, which is to say that I’m getting to the point.
Isaac Newton was a great physicist and one of history’s
greatest minds but he’d have made a lousy ski instructor. Newton wasn’t the
first person to notice that apples fell from the tree to the ground. His
contribution was in providing the correct explanation of why and how in a way
that allows science to analyze, predict, and precisely calculate the effects of
gravity. Without Newton, we’d never have flown in airplanes, launched
satellites, or been to the moon. Still, without Newton apples would still fall,
our kids would still tip their bikes the correct way going around corners, and
skiing would still be awesome with awesome sauce on it.
My second theme from the season is apt here: clarity is more
important than detail. Yes, that means clarity in explanation, but more
importantly it means clarity in our students’ understanding. When we’re careful
about digging further into the details and judicious about letting the
curiosity of our students govern how deep we go, we’re more likely to keep
things fun and make our teaching more effective for our guests. So, ski
teachers, don’t mess with anyone’s clear understanding of something by explaining
it. And this also goes for chefs, because I don’t want to know how much butter
you’ve used when I’m eating birthday cake.
Our ski season here in Vermont begins in a few
short weeks, and I’m looking forward to feeling gravity and lots of other
principles of physics without having to explain them too much. Did someone say
cake?